Do not confuse contradiction with intentional wrongdoing
A signed statement is not erased by saying it is withdrawn; correction creates another evidential record whose explanation will be tested.
The proposition that needs proof
What is inaccurate, why did the error occur, when was it discovered and what objective material supports the correction?
Every version should be examined with the warning, translation, interview conditions and information available at that time.
Create a version-and-contact matrix
Original audio and text, interpretation, corrections noted at signing, later statement, communications and corroborating records.
- PreserveSecure every original recording, text and version.
- CompareMark exact additions, omissions and contradictions without paraphrase.
- ExplainTest memory, translation, disclosure, pressure and objective corroboration.
Articles that may enter the qualification
These provisions are orientation points, not a conclusion. An investigation may start under one article and later be narrowed, expanded or reclassified as facts, expert results, article parts, aggravating circumstances and procedural decisions develop.
False information, testimony, conclusion or translation
A mistake, inconsistency or corrected account is not automatically intentional false testimony; warnings, language and context matter.
Read full Article 370 text on this pageFalse denunciation
An allegation that proves inaccurate is not automatically a knowingly false report; the original wording and the reporter's knowledge are central.
Read full Article 373 text on this pageRead the relevant provisions before the external source
The operative English text below is reproduced from the official consolidated Criminal Code of Georgia, publication 296, accessed 9 August 2026. Formatting has been normalised for on-screen reading; the current Georgian-language consolidated text controls if wording or timing differs.
Article 370False information, false testimony, false conclusion, failure to protect the object of the expert examination or incorrect translation+
1. Obstruction of justice, which was expressed in the provision of false information or a false testimony by an interviewee, witness or victim, the provision of a false conclusion or a false testimony by an expert, the failure by an expert to protect the object of an expert examination intentionally or by negligence, and/or the intentional incorrect translation by an interpreter during the investigation or in court, –
shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of four years.
2. The same act committed for mercenary purposes or other personal motive, –
shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of two to six years.
3. An act under paragraph 1 of this article committed in connection with the criminal case, in which an accused person is charged for a serious or particularly serious crime, –
shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of three to seven years.
4. An act under paragraph 1 or 3 of this article committed repeatedly, –
shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of four to eight years.
Open Article 370 in the official consolidated Criminal Code↗︎Article 373False denunciation+
1. False denunciation of the commission of a crime, –
shall be punished by a fine or community service from one hundred and eighty to two hundred and forty hours or with corrective labour from one to two years or with imprisonment for up to four years.
2. The same act accompanied by a charge for serious or particularly serious crime, or by a forgery of evidence supporting the accusation, –
shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of two to four years.
3. The act provided for by paragraph 2 of this article:
a) committed for mercenary purposes or with other personal motives;
b) resulting in grave consequences, –
shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of four to six years.
Open Article 373 in the official consolidated Criminal Code↗︎How counsel turns the issue into a case plan
For withdrawing or correcting a police statement, counsel can identify the operative procedure and decision-maker, test the prosecution theory against each legal element, obtain lawful defence material, frame expert or disclosure requests, preserve objections and prepare the next motion, hearing or cross-border step. Advice must be based on the actual record rather than the page title alone.
Obtain the original record and make any correction accurately, promptly and without coordinating accounts.
Questions clients ask about withdrawing or correcting a police statement
Does Article 370 — False information, testimony, conclusion or translation — automatically apply to Withdrawing or Correcting a Police Statement?+
For Withdrawing or Correcting a Police Statement, Article 370, Article 373 may provide a starting point, but a page title is not a legal qualification. Investigators and prosecutors must match proved facts to every element, part and aggravating circumstance. The qualification may be narrowed, expanded or changed after expert results, new evidence, a defence motion, prosecutorial review or a court decision. A mistake, inconsistency or corrected account is not automatically intentional false testimony; warnings, language and context matter.
Which factual boundary is decisive in a Withdrawing or Correcting a Police Statement case?+
In a Withdrawing or Correcting a Police Statement case, the evidence must distinguish an intentional offence against justice from mistake, inconsistency, translation difficulty or a lawful correction. That boundary is tested through the person's individual conduct, knowledge or intent, the legally classified consequence and every circumstance relied upon to move the allegation into a different article or aggravated part.
What evidence can prove—or undermine—the allegation of Withdrawing or Correcting a Police Statement?+
The focused record for Withdrawing or Correcting a Police Statement is not the same as for every offence. Priority material includes every version of the record, audio or video, interpreter material, contact history and objective corroboration. The defence should test provenance, completeness, authorship, lawful collection, chain of custody and whether each item proves the disputed element rather than merely repeating the accusation.
Can the article or charge for Withdrawing or Correcting a Police Statement change after the investigation starts?+
Yes. For Withdrawing or Correcting a Police Statement, Article 370, Article 373 may be a starting map, but expert results, quantity or value, injury classification, individual role, attempt or participation, a defence application, prosecutorial review or a court decision may support a different article, part or legal outcome.
What should be preserved immediately in a Withdrawing or Correcting a Police Statement matter?+
In a Withdrawing or Correcting a Police Statement matter, preserve the original chronology, procedural records and the topic-specific material before routine loss or alteration. Early advice is important because informal attempts to coordinate or retract accounts can create additional risk; preservation must be lawful and must not involve hiding, changing or coordinating evidence.
Primary sources for this guide
Legislation can change and official English translations may lag the Georgian text. Check the current consolidated version and obtain advice before relying on a deadline, offence classification or remedy.
Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia↗︎Criminal Code of Georgia↗︎Constitution of Georgia↗︎