Family safety · Article 175²

Restraining or Protective Order Breach Under Article 175²

Defence and victim-side representation where non-compliance with a restraining or protective order, or disobedience to a social-worker separation decision, is alleged.

Administrative Offences CodeChecked 27 August 2026
Short answer

The analysis begins with the complete operative order: which term was active, when and how it was served, what conduct allegedly breached it and what evidence proves knowledge and contact. Reconciliation, invitation or family pressure should not be assumed to cancel a legal restriction.

Discuss the report →
Exact terms, notice and alleged contact

An order-breach case is controlled by the document in force

A summary in a police report is not enough. Counsel should obtain the signed or certified order, all pages and annexes, the service record, any extension or cancellation and the precise clause said to have been breached.

Article 175² addresses non-compliance with requirements and obligations under restraining and protective orders and disobedience to a social worker’s decision to separate a minor. The provision has several parts and interacts with domestic-violence legislation, criminal offences and child-protection measures.

Contact restrictions may concern a person, home, workplace, school, child, weapon, electronic monitoring or communication through third parties. The defence or victim-side review must identify whether the restriction was clear, active and known, and then reconstruct what actually occurred without creating further prohibited contact.

The four records that determine the case

01

The complete order, decision or extension and the exact clause allegedly breached

02

Proof of personal service, explanation, translation and the period the restriction was active

03

Objective contact, location, access-control, call, message or monitoring evidence

04

Prior order history and any separate allegation of violence, threat, stalking or child risk

Order and incident material to preserve

  • Certified restraining or protective order and every annex or modification
  • Service record, risk assessment, translation and explanation of obligations
  • Calls, messages, social-media records and third-party communications in full context
  • CCTV, door-entry, GPS, transport and electronic-monitoring information
  • Emergency-call, patrol, medical and witness records concerning the alleged incident
  • Child-protection and social-worker decision where separation of a minor is involved

Representation may be defensive, protective or coordinated

For a person accused of breach, advice should focus on strict compliance while evidence and the legal basis are challenged through the proper route. Direct attempts to explain matters to the protected person can create additional evidence or a further alleged breach.

For a protected person or family member, representation may involve preserving the violation record, seeking urgent safety action and coordinating the administrative allegation with the criminal or protective-order process. A victim’s later communication should be recorded accurately but should not be treated as automatically cancelling an order issued by police or court.

Administrative and criminal boundary

Provisions and connected classifications

Administrative Article 175²

Non-compliance with protective measures

The operative clause, service, knowledge, alleged conduct and applicable part must be proved.

Read the Article 175² scope
Criminal Article 126¹

Domestic violence

A new allegation of violence or qualifying systematic conduct requires a separate Criminal Code assessment.

Read domestic-violence guide
Protective-order law

Order terms and challenge

The issuing route, duration, modification and challenge procedure arise under connected protective legislation.

Read order-response guide
Administrative Code reference

Article 175² — match the alleged act to the active clause

This provision has distinct routes for restraining orders, protective orders and a social worker’s separation decision. The applicable paragraph, prior history and current criminal boundary must be checked from the operative Georgian text.

Article 175²Non-compliance with restraining or protective orders; social-worker separation decision
Administrative Offences Code

The article addresses non-compliance with requirements and obligations contained in restraining and protective orders and disobedience to a social worker’s decision to separate a minor.

The exact order type, applicable paragraph, prior history and any conduct that may create criminal liability must be verified. The certified order and service record are central evidence.

Open the current consolidated Code on Matsne

Article parts, sanctions and procedural routes can be amended. The current Georgian consolidated text and the document served in the case control.

How representation is organised

01Secure the operative order
02Confirm service and active period
03End any disputed contact
04Preserve digital and location proof
05Separate new alleged offences
06Coordinate safety, hearing and appeal
Sources & legal review

Primary sources for this guide

Reviewed on 27 August 2026. Administrative sanctions and procedures are amended regularly, and an official English publication may lag behind the operative Georgian text. Verify the cited part, authority and service record before acting.

Administrative Offences Code of Georgia — current consolidated recordLaw on the Elimination of Violence against Women and/or Domestic ViolenceCriminal Code of Georgia — connected domestic-violence offences
Administrative-offence matter in Georgia?

Review the report before the hearing or appeal deadline.

Send the complete operative order, proof of service and the alleged contact record. If there is current danger or an active arrest response, use emergency services and call for urgent legal assistance.

Urgent assistance