Influence Peddling. The first task is to reconstruct the decision and approval chain. The statutory starting point shown on this page is Article 339¹ (Influence peddling). It is potentially relevant where an advantage is linked to alleged improper influence over a decision-maker rather than a direct official act.
Preserve the request, claimed access to a decision-maker, promised outcome, transfer of value and communications linking the intermediary, payer and public decision.
Questions to answer first
Reconstruct the decision and approval chain
Distinguish lawful services from an alleged improper advantage
Review procurement, grant and payment records
Assess public and private roles separately
Evidence that may matter
- Tender and procurement files
- Contracts, invoices and payments
- Official decisions and approvals
- Messages, calls and meetings
- Audio, video and witness material
Criminal Code articles to check
Influence peddling
Potentially relevant where an advantage is linked to alleged improper influence over a decision-maker rather than a direct official act.
Read full Article 339¹ text on this pageBribe-taking
The alleged advantage, recipient's official status, requested or performed act, intent and evidence of exchange must be proved.
Read full Article 338 text on this pageRead the relevant Criminal Code provisions
The panel below reproduces the available official English wording for convenient reading. Check the current Georgian text and the exact article part before relying on it, because later amendments may not yet appear in translation.
Article 339¹Influence peddling+
1. Whoever in his/her own interests or in those of another person promises, offers or grants money, securities, other assets, material benefit or any other unlawful advantage, directly or indirectly, to a person claiming or confirming that he/she can exert an unlawful influence, for his/her own or another person’s benefit, on the decisions of an official or a person equal thereto, regardless of whether or not such influence has been exerted and/or the desirable outcome of such influence has been obtained, –
shall be punished by a fine or corrective labour for up to two years, or by house arrest for a term of six months to two years or imprisonment for up to two years.
2. If a person who claims or confirms that he/she can exert unlawful influence on the decision of an official or of a person equal to the official demands or accepts, directly or indirectly, for his/her own benefit or for the benefit of another person, money, securities, other assets, material benefit or any other unlawful advantage from a person who acts in his/her own or another person’s interests, regardless of whether or not such influence has been exerted and/or the desirable outcome of such influence has been obtained, –
shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of three to five years.
3. The act provided for by paragraph 2 of this article committed by an organised group, –
shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of four to seven years.
Note:
1. For the offence provided for by paragraph 1 of this article, criminal liability shall not apply to a person who has voluntarily notified this fact to the authorities conducting criminal proceeding. A decision to discharge a person from criminal liability shall be taken by the authorities conducting criminal proceedings.
2. A fine shall be imposed on a legal person for committing the act provided for by this article.
The consolidated official source is listed in the source section at the end of this guide.
Article 338Bribe-taking+
1. Taking or demanding by an official or a person equal thereto, directly or indirectly, of money, securities, other assets, pecuniary gain or of any other unlawful advantage, or accepting an offer or promise thereof for his/her own benefit or for the benefit of another person in order for the official or the person equal thereto to take or not to take certain actions during the exercise of his/her official powers for the benefit of the bribe-giver, or to use his/her official standing to achieve similar goals, or to exercise official patronage, –
shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of six to nine years.
2. Bribe-taking:
a) by a public political official;
b) in large quantities;
c) by a group of persons with preliminary agreement, –
shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of seven to eleven years.
3. The act provided for by paragraphs 1 and 2 of this article committed:
a) by a person convicted for bribe-taking;
b) repeatedly;
c) by extortion;
d) by an organised group;
e) in particularly large quantities, –
shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of eleven to fifteen years.
Note: Taking of a bribe in large quantities shall mean the amount of money, securities, other assets or pecuniary gain exceeding GEL 10 000; bribe in particularly large quantities shall mean the amount exceeding GEL 30 000.
The consolidated official source is listed in the source section at the end of this guide.
How the process may develop
Primary sources for this guide
Before acting, compare this guide with the current Georgian text and the exact document served in the case. The official English translation may not include the latest amendment.
Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia↗︎Official consolidated Criminal Code — current text & PDF↗︎Ministry of Finance Investigation Service↗︎